RESOLUTION
POLITICAL RESOLUTION
(Adopted by the 16th Congress, of
Communist Party of India (Marxist) October 5-11,1998, Calcutta)
INTERNATIONAL
1.1 The events during the last three and a half years since the 15th Congress confirm
the fact that the political, economic and ideological offensive unleashed by imperialism
after dismantling of the socialist system in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe is being
increasingly resisted by progressive forces the world over. However, as was noted, these
reverses to the forces of world socialism provide an opportunity for the expansion of
capitalism, temporarily shifting the balance of forces in favour of imperialism.
1.2 Not withstanding this, during this period, capitalism has shown more clearly its
inability to solve the basic problems facing humanity. The tremendous growth of productive
forces aided by scientific and technological advance has resulted in a situation where the
economic growth that is taking place in the advanced capitalist countries is best
described as "jobless growth". Another feature of this growth is fast growing
disparities within and among countries the world over. The very class nature of capitalism
is manifesting itself with a greater ferocity, intensifying exploitation of the working
people and of the developing countries throughout the world. Such a pattern of development
is posing a serious threat to the worlds environment also. The ever growing and
enormous potential for developing productive forces which have been opened by the
scientific and technological revolution is being limited by the logic of capitalist
production relations and its search for maximum profits. In this process, all the major
contradictions between imperialism and socialism, imperialism and the third world
countries, labour and capital, and inter-imperialist contradictions are getting
intensified.
1.3 Globalisation has acquired a world wide dimension in the financial sphere with the
current practically unhindered circulation of transnational capital. This process is
helped by developments in science and technology, particularly information technology. The
internationalisation of the third world countries together allow not only the
consolidation of capitalism but also new imperialist offensives that are mounted against
the majority of the people of this world. The attempts to doctor the economies of the
third world countries to suit imperialist interests while seriously assaulting their
sovereignty is proceeding through the IMF-World Bank and the WTO.
1.4 The overall development in the world capitalist system, however, is marked by the
contrasting development of a degree that was not seen earlier. Reflecting the uneven and
cyclical nature of capitalist development, Germany and Japan which witnessed rapid growth
in recent decades are now in the midst of a crisis with sagging growth rates, rising
unemployment and weak currencies. The crisis in Japan has reached unprecedented levels. On
the other hand, the United States and Britain have turned around from relative stagnation
to register higher GDP growth rates than the OECD average, alongwith a relatively lower
and even declining unemployment levels.
1.5 In the advanced capitalist countries, particularly of Europe, important
developments have taken place. The rightwing offensive which began in the eighties
targeted the social welfare benefits earned by the working class through decades of
struggle. The absence of socialist system in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
heightened the cuts as social security expenditure was no longer imperative to check the
spread of socialist ideas. This trend was intensified with the efforts of the European
Union countries to implement the Maastricht Treaty provisions. In order to keep the fiscal
deficit down to 3 percent of GDP which is the criterion for the European Monetary Union,
the ruling classes in Western European countries are reducing public expenditure
drastically and cutting down pensions, health, education and other welfare benefits of the
working people. The restructuring of industry has been leading to high levels of
unemployment.
1.6 The important productive force, the working class is being undermined. The
"jobless growth" has, according to the Human Development Report, 1996, resulted
in 39 million unemployed in the OECD countries. Describing the world wide situation the
Report states, "Unemployment is high and growing". The 1997 report notes that,
"Many industrial countries have watched unemployment soar to levels not recorded
since the 1930s and income inequality reach levels not recorded since the last
century". On the impact of the neo-liberal economic policies the report notes,
"Rising unemployment, falling wages and cuts in social services are driving many
people into poverty in industrial countries-and threatening the futures of millions more.
Many of the poorest are kept at the bottom by social exclusion."
1.7 It is on these issues that big working class struggles have taken place all over
Europe particularly in France, Italy and Germany. The most significant protest action was
the general strike in France by the public sector employees in the winter of 1995 which
was directed against globalisation and privatisation. This growing resistance was also
reflected in the massive South Korean workers strike of 1996. Similarly, growing
resistance to the neo-liberal economic offensive is seen in the widespread struggles in
Latin America. Though these struggles have so far been defensive in character (i.e.
protecting the existing rights and benefits), they nevertheless constitute a growing
resistance to new capitalist offensives.
1.8 The struggle of the working class against the attacks on social welfare and rights
of the working people and the growing abandonment by the State of its social
responsibilities are finding expression not only through trade union struggles but also
have its political impact. This is seen in the recent election results in France, Italy,
Britain, Greece and Germany where the rightwing ruling parties were dislodged from power
and social democratic parties and Centre-left governments took office. However, a
disquieting feature has been the growth of xenophobia and neo-fascist forces in some of
these countries. Racism is also growing as a result of the social distortion and
unemployment caused by the present conditions. The reactionary forces are seeking to
exploit the growing popular discontent to their advantage.
1.9 An important development that continues to have a significant bearing on world
capitalism is the crisis that erupted in the economies of South East Asian Countries.
These so-called Asian Tigers held out as models for third world countries were
used to spread the illusion that the third world economies can only advance by following
the prescriptions of the IMF and the World Bank. Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Philippines and South Korea, which experienced high growth rates for several years are now
in the midst of a deep crisis which began with the flow of capital out of their countries
and weakening of their currencies. This currency crisis spread to Hong Kong and had global
ramifications manifested in the world wide stock market crash in 1997. Subsequently, the
crisis deepened leading to a collapse of Russian financial markets.
1.10 In order to contain the crisis, the IMF and World Bank doled out an
unprecedentedly massive financial assistance to shore up these economies. Yet, the crisis
did not abate. On the contrary it deepened affecting Japan. The Japanese yen has
depreciated significantly and the government has officially admitted that the country is
in the grip of a recession. This in turn will further compound the crisis with serious
implications for world capitalism. The economic crisis manifested itself in the severe
defeat of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party in the recent elections to Japans
upper house of Parliament leading to the resignation of the Prime Minister.
1.11 The internationalisation of finance capital and its consequent pressures for the
removal of all barriers for its free movement in search of predatory speculative profits
is the main factor triggering this crisis. The specific aim is to open the economies,
particularly the capital markets of the third world countries for quick profits. This has
shattered the illusion that the third world can develop as appendages of imperialist
capital.
1.12 These IMF-World Bank pressures to open the economies of third world countries to
international flows of speculative capital had ruined the Mexican economy in 1994. In 1997
the same policies have plunged the South East Asian economies in a serious crisis.
Millions of people have been ruined and adversely affected by this crisis. Militant
protests and spontaneous outbursts like food riots took place in many countries.
1.13 In Indonesia, militant student demonstrations catalysed a massive popular upsurge
against the dictatorial regime of Suharto. He was forced to step down after nearly three
decades of tyrannical rule. But the successor he nominated is continuing with the same
ruinous economic policies to the detriment of the living conditions of the common people.
1.14 The lesson for the third world countries from this is obvious. With the IMF
insisting that they switch over to full capital convertibility their economies will be at
the mercy of international speculators and predatory capital. The G-15 summit held in
Malaysia in November 1997 voiced the concerns of the developing countries about the
predatory role of speculative finance capital and the unequal terms of trade. The IMF, in
the meantime, is amending its articles of agreement to incorporate a mandate to oversee
global capital account liberalisation.
1.15 In the erstwhile socialist countries, the process of restoration of capitalism is
facing resistance due to the huge drop in living conditions of the people, increased
poverty, unemployment and violent ethnic conflicts which occurred after socialism was
dismantled. The Human Development Report 1996 states, "In Eastern Europe and the CIS
countries unemployment has ballooned (from zero) since the start of reforms in 1990, with
wage employment falling sharply by as much as 30 percent in Bulgaria and
Hungary." The 1997 report state that these countries "have seen the greatest
deterioration in the past decade. Income poverty has spread from a small part of their
population to about a third 120 million people." The recent financial crisis
in Russia has sharply aggravated the miseries of the people. The political crisis that
this triggered off has seen the Communist Party of Russian Federation mobilising the
popular discontent in a big way. Yeltsin could not finally appoint a Prime Minister of his
choice with the Communist dominated Parliament twice rejecting his nominee. He had to
finally compromise. The popular discontent in many of these countries is expressed in the
rejection of some of the rightwing regimes which had embarked on outright capitalist
restoration in these countries. In some others, parties organised by the former communists
have gained popular support and have come to power reflecting popular discontent with the
capitalist restoration, though they do not mean a return to the socialist path.
- The imposition of structural adjustment, the severe explotiation of labour, the system
of unequal trade, the plunder of natural resources by the imperialist powers and the
multinational corporations continue to unbearably burden the third world people. According
to the Human Development Report of 1996, of the $23 trillion global GDP in 1995, $18
trillion is in the industralised countries and only $5 trillion in the developing
countries even though they have nearly 80 percent of the worlds people. According to
the 1997 Report, "The share of the poorest 20 percent of the worlds people in
global income now stands at a miserable 1.1%, down from 1.4% in 1991 and 2.3% in 1960. It
continues to shrink. And, the ratio of the top 20% to that of the poorest 20% rose from
30:1 in 1960 to 60:1 in 1991 and to a startling new high of 78:1 in 1994."
- The development of regional economic blocs, noted in the last Congress, reflects the
existence of the three major centres of world capitalism, their mutual rivalries and
attempts to consolidate their position. The European Union with its drive to achieve
monetary union is one pole. The other is the NAFTA led by the US trying to extend it
southwards into Latin America. The third pole is Japan and its efforts to expand its
sphere in East and South-east Asia.
- The United States maintains its hegemonistic role in the imperialist system. This
continues despite some conflicts with other powers like Japan, France and Germany. It is
the US backing which emboldens Israel to violate the terms of even the unequal peace
agreement to deprive the Palestinians of real autonomy and block the formation of an
independent Palestinian State. USA continues with its military manoeuvers in West Asia and
inhuman sanctions against lraq. Libya is also subject to sanctions. The brazen and
unilateral missile attacks on Sudan and Afghanistan by US imperialism, once again, reveals
its hegemonistic designs. These attacks confirm that the USA uses all reactionary and
terroristic forces to advance its objective. The "Dayton Accord" provided the
basis for US intervention in the Balkans. The US is actively working to subvert and
suppress progressive and revolutionary forces in Nicaragua, EL Salvador and other Latin
American countries. In Central Asia, the former Asian Soviet Republics are gaining
increasing significance in US strategic designs. Besides US imperialism seeks to control
the economic resources in this area, particularly the oil reserves.
- US imperialism strengthened by the current revival of its economy is seeking to
consolidate its global hegemony. The expansion of NATO eastwards and the membership of
some of the East-European countries in NATO is a glaring expression of the US designs. The
USA and other imperialist powers refuse to destroy nuclear weapons thus sabotaging all
efforts to achieve universal nuclear disarmament. The much touted propaganda that the
end of the cold war would see marked reduction in armament expenditure
resulting in a peace dividend benefitting humanity, has just not materialised.
The 1997 Human Development report notes "The post-cold war reductions in military
expenditures should have been seen as a major opportunity for social investment. Instead,
the priority seems to be saving money and reducing services. The very idea of the welfare
State has been called into question and is under threat". On the other hand, by
persisting with the theory of "nuclear deterrence", work on programmes for
production of new weapons is growing, thus ensuring the nuclear monopoly in the hands of a
few imperialist powers.
- The United Nations instead of promoting disarmament, development, political solutions to
conflicts and international cooperation tends to become an instrument of hegemonistic
policies of the US and its allies. The democratic restructuring of the United Nations and
its Security Council is urgently called for. The IMF, World Bank WTO, NATO, a UN
manipulated by the US and other great imperialist powers, constitute the main pillars of
the imperialist vision of a new order. The imposition of its global economic agenda,
political pressures and military interventions constitute its new offensive.
- The socialist countries China, Vietnam, Cuba and DPR Korea have sought to protect their
path of socialist development in the face of the adverse world situation. China which has
undertaken economic reforms has emerged as a strong economic power with rapid progress
registered in every field of the economy. This development will have an important bearing
in the future days in the resistance to imperialist domination. Hong Kong which remained a
colony of British Imperialism has now been reunited with China. This is the result of the
policy adopted by the Communist Party of China of "one country-two systems." It
is a setback not only to British imperialism but for imperialism in general.
- Cuba which has been the relentless target of US imperialism and subjected to economic
blockade and subversion has today reorganised its economic relations and is courageously
defending the social achievements which are the fruits of the socialist system. Vietnam
has made steady progress in rebuilding its economy and raising the living standards of the
people. The DPRK has been firmly resisting US-Japanese pressures to undermine its
sovereignty while facing a difficult food situation domestically.
- Islamic fundamentalism, a phenomenon which has been prominent since the eighties,
continues to pose a threat to secular-democratic forces in many countries. The Taliban in
Afghanistan represents the most virulent and reactionary form of this trend. US
imperialism is tacitly backing the Taliban to establish its hegemony so that it can reach
out to Central Asia. The civil war in Afghanistan continues causing severe suffering to
the people. Despite the Presidential elections Algeria is still in the grip of terrorist
violence perpetuated by the Islamic fundamentalist groups.
- South Africa, the most developed capitalist country in the African continent, is
grappling with the problem of ensuring a just multiracial society where the black people
can advance towards economic emancipation and social progress. This struggle is being
waged by the progressive forces in a situation where big capital controls the economic
system and the vestiges of the old regimes hold powerful sway.
- The CPI(M) reaffirms its deep commitment to defend socialism and expresses its firm
solidarity with the socialist countries who face hostile imperialist manoeuvres.
- The worldwide resistance to the attempts by imperialism to impose its unequal order and
intensify exploitation is gathering momentum. This period has seen the revival and
regrouping of communists, progressive and democratic forces and the growing fight back by
the working class. The international trade union conference in Havana against
globalisation and neo-liberalism in August 1997 manifested the growing urge for united
struggles against the imperialist onslaughts. As have subsequent international meetings
all over the world commemorating the 150th anniversary of the publication of
the Communist Manifesto. The CPI(M) considers itself an integral part of this
international struggle and solidarity against imperialism. As a Party based on proletarian
internationalism, the CPI(M) will ceaselessly mobilise the Indian people to play their due
role in the struggle against the imperialist order and for democracy and socialism.
NATIONAL SITUATION
- A new situation arose in the country with the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government
assuming office in March 1998. For the first time, the reins of power at the Centre are in
the hands of an avowedly communal party which works under the guidance of the fascistic
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. This has greatly intensified the threat posed by the communal
forces to the secular and democratic foundations of the polity and the preservation of
national unity. Further the right reactionary Character of the BJP-RSS combine portends a
bigger onslaught on the working people and the Left and democratic forces.
- Before assessing how this changed situation came about it will be pertinent to recall
how we analysed the situation in the 15th Party Congress held in April 1995.
The Congress had come to the following main conclusions: (a) the period ahead will be
marked by growing political instability; (b) the economic policies being pursued by the
Congress(I) government will push the country towards greater indebtedness threatening our
economic sovereignty and impose greater burdens on the working people; (c) the growing
communal challenge gravely threatens the secular democratic foundations of independent
India, its unity and integrity and disrupts the unity of the working class and toiling
people.
- On this basis the 15th Congress laid down the tactical line of
(a)intensifying the struggles against the ruinous economic policies; (b)intensifying the
struggle against the communal forces both politically and ideologically; (c)Strengthening
the unity of Left, democratic and secular forces. In order to achieve these objectives,
the Party Congress highlighted the need to rally all sections of the people in developing
resistance to these challenges. The Party Congress gave the slogan "to defeat the
Congress and the BJP" and to work for the success of the third alternative.
- Two general elections have taken place since then, in May 1996 and in February-March
1998. Both these elections have confirmed what was anticipated in the 15th
Congress that the period of political instability continues with no party winning majority
in either of the elections. The results showed that (i) the period of one party dominance
has ended with the Congress losing its monopoly of power. The Congress suffered a rout in
the 1996 elections and could not recover ground in the 1998 elections; (ii)alongside the
decline of the Congress was the rise in the strength of the BJP which became the single
largest party in the Lok Sabha in 1996 and also in the subsequent election; (iii)the left
and democratic forces being weak, the discontent against the Congress misrule was utilised
by the BJP to make substantial gains. The Left could not increase their strength in
parliament.
- The years since the 15th Party Congress have seen the continuing decline of
the Janata Dal. It lost many seats in 1996 and suffered a split and further erosion in
1998. The regional parties are strong in certain states and their role at the national
level has increased. However, given their state level preoccupation some of these parties
adopt opportunist positions like what the Telugu Desam party did in supporting the
Vajpayee government after the recent elections.
- As the two general election results show, unless the Left gets strengthened and the
intervention of the Left and democratic forces steadily increases, radical change cannot
be brought about. The communal and rightist forces will continue to channelise the popular
discontent generated by the bourgeois-landlord rule, despite the fact that these very
forces support the policies of liberalisation which forms the basis for the growing
popular discontent. This is due to the weakness of the Left and democratic forces. Only
the growing intervention of the Left and democratic forces can checkmate the communal and
divisive forces who are misleading the people.
- The 15th Congress political resolution had stated that both in the struggle
against communalism and for opposing the economic policies, we should strive to ally with
the secular bourgeois opposition parties. But in doing so it should be realised that their
approach to economic policies is not the same as ours. Similarly, they will tend to take
opportunistic positions in the struggle against communalism if it affects their electoral
prospects. It is based on this understanding that the Central Committee worked out
electoral tactics and made efforts to forge a third alternative.
- The Party took the initiative after 1996 general elections to stop the BJP from forming
the government by the formation of the United Front. It was this wide unity forged which
led to the abrupt end of the unrepresentative 13-day Vajpayee government. Apart from the
Left, the United Front consisted of parties such as the Janata Dal, Samajwadi Pary and the
regional parties including the TDP, DMK, TMC and AGP. The United Front was not in a
position to form a government on its own. It was possible to form a secular government
only with the outside support of the Congress.
- In these circumstances, the Central Committee decided that the Party would not join the
government and to support it from outside. On the basis of this the United Front was
formed and a Steering Committee was constituted with our participation in it.
- Fully conscious of the fact that all the secular bourgeois-landlord parties also favour
the ruinous economic policies of liberalisation, the Party nevertheless participated in
the efforts to draw up a common minimum programme with the prime objective of thwarting
the attempt by communal parties to capture State power.
- This Common Minimum Programme was a compromise document reflecting the views of the
majority constituents of the UF regarding the direction of economic policy which was a
continuation of the earlier Congress economic policies. However, at the same time it
contained many other features which would have helped to advance the democratic movement
in the country. These pertain to federalism, secularism, social justice etc as well as
some commitments to give relief to the working people on certain issues.
- While supporting this government from the outside, the Central Committee also decided
that the Party should step up its independent activity, demarcate from the anti-people
policies of the UF government and consolidate the Partys position and influence.
Since the economic policies continued to impose burdens on the people, the consequent
popular discontent would sought to be exploited by the communal forces for their advance.
The Partys intervention should therefore be directed at trying to mobilise this
growing popular discontent into democratic channels.
- The Congress Party, which was increasingly worried about the investigations into
corruption of its top leaders, intervened and withdrew support to the Deve Gowda
government and demanded his ouster as a price for continuing support. In the United Front,
despite the firm stand taken by the CPI(M) and the Left parties, most of the other
constituents succumbed to this pressure. With the installation of the Gujral government,
the Congress party increasingly sought to make its presence felt. The overall performance
of the United Front government shows that despite positive steps in foreign policy and
Centre-States relations, it vigorously pursed policies which favoured liberalisation. It
failed to implement the major policy commitments in the CMP which where in the interests
of the people, the one-third reservation for women in legislatures, the central
legislation for agricultural workers, the Lok Pal bill, recognition of trade unions
through secret ballot and strengthening the public distribution system by providing for
foodgrains at half the price for people below the poverty line were all measures which
were not seriously taken up for adoption or implementation.
- The UF government fell because of the unjustified withdrawal of support by the Congress
using the pretext of the interim report of the Jain Commission. The elections held in
February-March 1998 led to a situation where the BJP advanced further through forging new
alliances with regional parties and was able to form a coalition government at the Centre
led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The advent of Sonia Gandhi into the leadership did not mark
any basic change in the discredited policies of the Congress Party. The United Front
suffered a setback and lost almost half the number of seats. The performance of the UF
government could not make a positive impact on the people due to its pursuance of the same
economic policies and failure to implement pro-people aspects of the Common Minimum
Programme, the negative impact of the policies pursued by the state governments run by the
non-Left constituents of the UF and the lack of cohesiveness and unity in facing the 1998
elections.
- The formation of the Vajpayee government is part of the continued rightward shift in
Indian politics which began a decade ago. The BJP has grown stronger with an increased
percentage of votes and seats. With its allies it has added on more than 60 seats since
the previous election. The growth of the BJP is accompanied by the continuing decline of
the Congress party. The erosion of the Congress has resulted in a shift in class terms of
considerable sections of the big bourgeois landlords in favour of the BJP. It is this
shift towards the reactionary party with a communal platform that has brought about a
major change in the situation.
Economic Policies: Harmful Effect Of Liberalisation
- The liberalisation and structural adjustment policies pursued by successive governments
since 1991 at the behest of the IMF and the World Bank are being carried forward much
further by the BJP government. Even the short period it has been in office has thoroughly
exposed the hollowness of the "swadeshi" plank, which it has been propagating.
The period since the 15th Party Congress has debunked the claims of steady
growth and the consequent benefits for the people touted by the advocates of
liberalisation. Increasingly, these policies which favour foreign capital and big business
are being shown up for what they are inimical to economic sovereignty and harmful
to the interests of the vast majority of the people.
- Despite the adverse impact of the policies introduced by the Narasimha Rao government in
1991, the UF government which took office in 1996, carried forward these policies and in
some respects went further ahead. In the 18 months of the UF Government, there was further
opening up to foreign capital, import liberalisation, efforts to disinvest in public
sector, emphasis on export oriented growth and liberal concessions to the affluent
sections through tax cuts.
- The BJP led coalition government has quickly abandoned its "swadeshi"
platform. It openly started wooing the MNCs in a big way. This has been accelerated in the
name of combating sanctions imposed by the USA after the nuclear tests. One of the first
acts of the Vajpayee government was to announce an exim policy which shifted 340 items to
the Open General License list including a large number of agricultural commodities, thus
removing quantitative restrictions on their imports. The first Union budget announced
delicenescing of coal, lignite and petroleum products, privatisation of the Indian
Airlines and throwing the insurance sector open to private capital. The government has
also declared war on the public sector by announcing that in all profit-making public
sector units, 74 percent of the equity shares would be sold off.
- Under liberalisation, the process of dismantling of the public sector is on, completely
reversing the basis of self-reliant development in post-independent India. This will
remove the only bulwark the country has against domination by imperialist capital. It
hands over virtually free to the foreign and Indian monopolists assets which were created
by the people with great sacrifice. The experience of the last few years show that
proceeds from the sale of PSU shares have been used for bridging the budget deficit and
not for modernisation and upgradation of the PSUs. The BJP governments policy of
privatisation of the oil industry and opening up the mineral reserves for exploitation by
multinational mining companies is most harmful for the countrys interests as it
leads to the looting of its exhaustible natural resources. The UF government had earlier
listed 35 industries for automatic entry of foreign capital upto 51 percent equity and
raised the foreign equity limit from 51percent to 74 percent in nine core and
infrastructure sectors. The BJP government has gone ahead to provide counter-guarantees to
power projects just as the Congress(I) government.
- On the question of foreign investment, the issue is not whether we need foreign capital
or not but what type of investment is required and on what terms. A large majority of the
capital-flows into the country has been in the nature of portfolio investment, which has
the character of "hot money." In the seven-year period of liberalisation there
has been 15 billion dollars of such investment, which is meant for speculative activities
and not productive capital. Such portfolio investment is also leading to takeover of
Indian companies by buying up their equity shares. Foreign direct investment which comes
in as productive capital has mainly been for either production of luxury consumer goods,
or for catering to the domestic market usually at the expense of domestic producers.
- The seven-years period of liberalisation has been marked by a distinct slowdown of
growth in the main productive sectors of the economy. The real GDP originating in growth
and other activities, which had grown at 3.7 percent per annum during the 1980s, grew at
only 2.8 percent during 1990-91 to 1996-97. The annual growth of food grain production has
been 1.7 percent, falling below the rate of population growth. This points to the
emergence of a serious food crisis caused by agricultural slowdown due to cutbacks in
public investment and shift of acerage to export agriculture. Instead of implementing land
reforms, land ceiling acts are sought to be diluted as witnessed in Karnataka, Maharashtra
and Madhya Pradesh.
- The living conditions of the rural poor has worsened. The cutbacks in public investment
and expenditure in rural areas, the lower employment intensity of export-oriented
agriculture compared to food grains, and the increase in the average price which the poor
have had to pay for their food, are the factors responsible. The wide fluctuation in the
prices of non-food crops is adversely affecting the poorer sections of the peasantry. The
peasantry, which was supposed to have benefited from the shift to export agriculture, is
caught in a new trap. The plight of large number of cotton farmers who have been driven to
suicide in Andhra Prades and similar cases in Karnataka, Maharashtra and Punjab are
indicative of this. The reliance on loans with high interest for purchasing inputs like
pesticides, seeds and fertilisers leads to peasants getting into a debt trap when the
prices of cash crops collapse or when crops fail.
- In the industrial sphere, the slowdown in production led to a recessionary condition in
1996-97 and growth in industrial production will be even less in 1997-98 with capital
goods sector exhibiting negative growth. The current stagnation is not just because of
cutbacks in public spending but is also partly a result of dumping of foreign goods on the
Indian market. The small-scale industries which made a substantial contribution to
production and employment are badly hit by these policies. Sections of domestic
capitalists have become apprehensive about the entry of multinationals on favourable terms
and its adverse effects on domestic industry.
- The trade deficit has widened sharply in the last two years and it is 6.8 billion
dollars in 1997-98. This is despite the fact that the period witnessed an industrial
recession, which depressed import demand. The basic trade imbalance, which was an excuse
for "structural adjustment," has worsened rather than improved during the period
of "structural adjustment". The WTO regime compels India to give up quantitative
restrictions on imports which adversely affects domestic industry and agriculture. Change
in patent laws are called for to suit the interests of the advanced capitalist countries.
- On the fiscal front, the government has consistently refused to mobilise resources from
the affluent sections through direct taxation. Indias central tax revenue to GDP
ratio remains one of the lowest in the world. The 1997-98 budget presented by Chidambaram
gave away concessions worth Rs10000 crores to the rich and the BJP governments
1998-99 budget has also refrained from raising any additional revenue from direct taxes.
Lowering the taxes on the corporate sector and the rich and increasing resort to indirect
taxation, which burdens the common man, is a marked feature of liberalisation. After
refusing to tax the rich and then complaining about a resource crunch, successive
governments have made this the basis for inviting multinational corporations. The
scrapping of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) and the proposed legislations in
its place will legitimise economic offenses and give a fillip to hawala transactions.
- The adverse developments of the nineties since the introduction of liberalisation have
finally culminated in the present crisis of 1997-98. Foodgrain production is estimated to
drop by over 50 lakh (5 million) tonnes compared to the preceding year, slowdown in the
growth of industrial production continues and it will be less than 5 percent in 1997-98.
Trade deficit stands at the highest ever in the nineties. The fiscal deficit is growing as
also the governments revenue deficit. The sanctions imposed by the USA and its
allies in the wake of the nuclear blasts will create serious difficulties with regard to
foreign financial flows into the country, speculators will pull out capital from the
country leading to further depreciation of the rupee. The rupee has touched a new low of
42to a dollar. The external debt burden increased by around Rs 44,000 crore in the eight
month period between end September 1997 and June 1998 on account of the 15 percent
depreciation of the rupee against the dollar. The BJP governments policies will end
up straightening the leverage of imperialism on the economy and India becoming more
vulnerable to speculation by international finance capital.
Conditions Of
The People
- The seven year period following the IMF-World bank prescriptions have been a period of
unremitting deterioration in the living conditions of the ordinary people, particularly
the rural poor. The percentage of people living below the poverty line rose from 34.3 in
1989-90 to 39.6 in 1994-95. Sixteen percent of the rural population have access to less
than Rs 3 per day. The real wages of agricultural labourers fell during the 1991-95
period. Per capita availability of pulses declined from 41.6 gms in 1991 to 34 gms in
1996.
- Continuous price rise has affected all sections of the people with the poor hit the
hardest because of the prices of food items increasing most in the past few years. After
the BJP came to power and the first budget, there has been a steep rise in the rate of
inflation. Prices of vegetables, pulses, edible oils and all other essential commodities
have shot up and made life unbearable for the people. The public distribution system is in
shambles in most places and the BJP-led government with its pro-trader bias wishes to
dismantle the system, while providing greater opportunities to the big traders to reap
super profits. The decision to delicense the sugar industry will adversely affect the
price of sugar and its availability in the PDS.
- The period has witnessed shrinkage of employment opportunities affecting agricultural
workers and women workers most. Employment in public sector undertakings declined by one
lakh (0.1 million) in the five year period since 1991. The ranks of registered job seekers
have swelled to 3 crore 76 lakhs (37.6 million). The State has reduced its
responsibilities in the social welfare sector. Expenditure of central and state
governments on education and health as a percentage of GDP has shown a steady decline in
this period resulting in the deterioration of education and health services for the
ordinary people. Fifty three percent of all children under five years in India suffer from
malnutrition according to the UNICEF.
Struggle For alternative
Economic Policies
- The CPI(M) has a full-fledged alternative economic policy. The alternative approach is
based on raising domestic resources by widening the tax net and increasing direct taxes on
the affluent sections; unearthing black money, curbing inessential expenditure and
increasing public investment. The industrial policy should streamline and strengthen the
public sector in the strategic and core areas while encouraging domestic industry and
indigenous technology. Foreign capital must be solicited on the basis of national
priorities and technology needs.
- The 15th Congress had placed an alternative path which required
implementation of radical land reforms and rural employment generation schemes which can
expand the domestic market, a significant increase in public investment in agriculture for
generating higher agricultural growth, a public distribution system which covers 14
essential commodities and caters to all areas in the country, expansion of primary
education, literacy and health services, greater decentralisation of powers and larger
devolution of financial resources from the Centre to the states and down to the panchayat
level.
- For realising these alternative policies, the struggle against the current economic
policies will have to be intensified. In this context it needs to be highlighted that the
impact of these policies is not confined to the economic sphere alone. Its retrograde
impact can be seen in all spheres of political and social life like media, culture,
democratic institutions and the polity itself. The decadence that it spreads eats into the
vitals of our social fibre.
The Communal Threat
- The build up of the communal threat since the BJP-RSS-VHP offensive on the Ayodhya issue
has now acquired a new dimension with the BJP-led government at the Centre. What was being
sought to be achieved through injecting communal poison and arousing communal feelings
among the masses will be supplemented by the use of State power and the penetration of the
State apparatus by the RSS outfits. The agenda of the BJP-RSS will now be sought to be
advanced through the government in both an overt and covert manner. The "National
Agenda" of the BJP and its allies does not contain some of the key aims of the
Hindutva forces. The building of the temple at Ayodhya, the abrogation of Article 370 and
Article 30 which gives protection to minorities and the imposition of a uniform civil code
are some of the measures which have been kept outside the official agenda but which are
being pursued by other means.
- The RSS fronts like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and the Bajrang Dal are going ahead with
their communal agenda utilising the advantage of having the BJP in power at the Centre.
For the Ram temple at Ayodhya, building materials and stone work is being carried out in
various places in Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh by the VHP. The Bajrang Dal has announced
that it will train Hindu youth in every block of the country to combat "the
activities of Christian missionaries and cultural invaders." The BJP has taken
control of three key ministries home, information and broadcasting and human
resource development. These are being utilised apart from the Prime Ministers office
which in the present dispensation decides appointments to key posts, to penetrate the
administration and the educational system and the media. Secular principles are being
subverted by the introduction of the communal ideology in the educational system and
cultural institutions. The proposed National Reconstruction Corps will facilitate RSS
penetration among the youth. The Maharashtra governments rejection of the Srikrishna
Commission report and its refusal to take action against those found responsible for the
communal riots in Mumbai exposes the culpability of the Shiv Sena-BJP alliance in the
criminal violence. The Centres support of this stand signals open encouragement to
communalising the adminstration and subverting the rule of law.
- Even in the "national agenda" the BJP is pushing for those measures which will
advance the aims of the RSS. The nuclear tests and weaponisation is one such step. The
other is the review of the Constitution which has been promised both in the BJP election
manifesto and in the "national agenda." Under the cover of making a
comprehensive review of the Constitution, the BJP wants to legitimise the change of the
present parliamentary system and replace it with the presidential form government. Such a
move will faciliate an authoritarian system, undermining the federal character and
trampling upon the rights of the states, which will suit the RSS in its pursuit of a Hindu
rashtra.
- Despite the façade of a coalition and alliance with many state based parties, the
BJPs talk of devolving more powers to the states is deceptive. Its conception of
more powers to the state is confined only to the financial sphere while in the political
sphere it seeks to reduce the role of state governments and force them to kowtow to the
Centre. The arbitrary use of Central teams despatched to opposition ruled states to
enquire into the law and order situation illustrates this anti-federal approach. The
moment the BJP feels confident to go it alone it will ride roughshod over the rights of
states especially those which have ruling parties politically opposed to it. The promise
to form smaller states beginning with three new states is designed to break the linguistic
basis of states so that an authoritarian Centre can dominate the smaller states.
- The reactionary character of the BJP has also been clearly brought out by the record of
the state governments it has been running. The Shiv Sena BJP government in
Maharashtra has been openly anti-dalit exemplified by the massacre of 10 dalits in police
firing in Mumbai. It has been forcibly removing Bengali-speaking citizens from Mumbai on
the pretext of deporting illegal Bangladeshi migrants. In Rajasthan, the BJP government
refuses to act against atrocities on women and openly sides with feudal elements and big
business. The Kalyan Singh government was formed in Uttar Pradesh after the BJP
shamelessly organised defections of the Congress and the BSP MLAs by using money power and
other corrupt methods. Some notorious criminals were sworn in as ministers and a 94-member
ministry, the largest ever in the country, was formed. The UP episode showed to what
depths of sordid intrigue the BJP can descend to in order to capture power. The BJP
government in Delhi has set a new record in misrule with severe price-rise, alarming crime
rate, factional fights and blatant corruption. In all these states, BJP shamelessly woos
MNCs while talking about Swadeshi. The BJP-ruled states are marked by hostility to working
class struggles and the use of repressive measures such as ESMA.
Minority Rights
- The CPI(M) is committed to protect the legitimate rights of the minorities and defend
them from the attacks of majority communalism. Contrary to the false propaganda of the
Hindu communalists, the Muslims are a deprived community. Most of them are poverty-striken
and they are discriminated in education and jobs. The CPI(M) will work for equal
opportunities in all spheres of society for the Muslim minority. It will strive for this
by drawing the Muslim masses into the common struggles and democratic movement.
- At the same time, the CPI(M) will counter minority communalism. Fundamentalist forces
like the Jamaat-e-Islami and other organisations which are finding sustenance from abroad
are seeking to exploit the alienation of the minorities. The fundamentalist forces seek to
isolate the minorities from the rest of the people and prevent social reforms which will
help the community to progress. They adopt a reactionary attitude to womens rights.
The CPI(M) will fight for the equal rights for Muslim women and will seek to break down
the barriers which isolate the minorities from their class brethren in other communities.
- The disruptive role of the Muslim fundamentalist groups was highlighted by the bomb
explosions in Coimbatore on the eve of the general elections which killed around 60
people. These blasts were in retaliation for the communal violence unleashed by the Hindu
Munnani, an RSS outfit, against the Muslims earlier on in the city. Such tactics are
counter productive for the minorities themselves and play into the hands of the Hindu
communalists. The minorities become the worst sufferers when the State takes repressive
measures and in the counter-offensive of the Hindu communalists. It is essential that the
Party along with other Left democratic forces intervene well in advance before such a
situation develops to defend their rights and do not fall prey to fundamentalist
influence. The democratic consciousness in the minorities must be raised to enable them to
see how the fundamentalist tactics are self-defeating.
- The minority Christian community is also coming under increasing attacks by the majority
communal forces. The RSS-BJP is specifically targeting the Christian community. The front
organisations of the RSS such as the VHP are threatening and intimidating these sections.
Some churches in Gujrat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh have been destroyed or damaged. It
is imperative in the interest of national unity and social harmony that such attacks by
majority communalism are resisted and defeated.
Against
Nuclear Jingoism
- The Vajpayee government has surreptitiously and illegitimately reversed the
long-standing nuclear policy of the country. Upto 1998, Indias policy consisted of
three components. Firstly, India did not accept the discriminatory treaties like NPT and
CTBT which favoured nuclear weapon states and their monopoly over nuclear weapons. Second,
India kept its nuclear option open and updated its nuclear technology which was primarily
used for peaceful purposes. Third, India consistently advocated universal nuclear
disarmament and called for specific steps to be taken in this regard by the nuclear
weapons states. It is this policy which stood India in good stead, maintaining its
sovereign rights, in tune with the non-aligned foreign policy and the policy for world
peace through nuclear disarmament.
- It is only the BJP which advocated the making of nuclear weapons. To fulfil the
long-cherished RSS demand that India make the atom bomb, the Vajpayee government which
itself is beleaguered with difficulties within its coalition and having a precarious
majority in parliament, went ahead with conducting nuclear tests and announced that India
is weaponising. The tests accompanied by a build up of statements against China by the
defence minister was followed up by the letter of the Prime Minister to Clinton citing
China as the main security threat along with Pakistan. At the same time, the BJP is
conspicuously silent about the US military base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean which
stocks nuclear weapons. The disruption of the process of normalisation of relations with
China going on for the past one decade will only help US imperialism to intervene in the
region in a bigger way.
- The tests were followed by the jingoistic statements of the BJP-VHP-RSS leaders. The
union home minister, Advani warned Pakistan that the Kashmir problem will be solved in the
light of the new situation of India being a nuclear weapons power. The belligerent
statements directed against Pakistan and on Kashmir have provided the opportunity for the
western poweres to internationalise the Kashmir issue as is evident from the statement
issued by the G-7; by the meeting of the permanent members of the Security Council held in
Geneva and subsequently the UN Security Council resolution.
- The nuclear tests by Pakistan in responses to the Pokhran explosions can lead to a
nuclear arms race unless both countries stop the competitive race and declare they will
not weaponise. Any confrontation and arms build up between India and Pakistan will lead to
diversion of priorities the country should have in dealing with the vital problems of the
people concerning poverty, hunger, disease and unemployment. The resources which will be
squandered in such a nuclear arms race will hit the poorest sections of our country most.
Further, this will provide grist to the mill of the communal forces on both sides who
using this atmosphere of confrontation will further spread the communal poison for their
political benefits. We should pledge no use of nuclear weapons and initiate a dialogue
with Pakistan so that both countries draw back from a nuclear arms race.
- Communalism and jingoism will be the weapons utilised by the reactionary forces to
launch further attacks on the livelihood of the working people and to suppress their
democratic rights. This path must be stopped and rolled back. Otherwise there will be the
threat of an authoritarian set-up being imposed on the country.
- The BJPs nuclear policy has made India more vulnerable to imperialist pressures. A
situation of instability in the region will only help imperialist strategic designs. India
has been made more vulnerable to pressures to sign discriminatory treaties like the NPT
and the CTBT. The Vajpayee governments offer to consider signing the CTBT signals
capitulation to these pressures. In the name of resisting economic sanctions, the process
of opening up the country to imperialist finance capital is being speeded up. The nuclear
arms race will require resources for which India would be forced to take recourse to
international borrowings, further The BJPs nuclear policy has made India more
vulnerable to imperialist pressures mortgaging our country.
- The CPI(M) has consistently opposed the US-led hegemony of an unequal nuclear order and
treaties like the NPT which perpetuate the monopoly of nuclear weapons in the hands of
some countries without advancing towards universal nuclear disarmament. All patriotic
forces in the country must oppose the sanctions imposed by the Western countries. These
nuclear weapon countries and the others who have supported an unequal nuclear order in the
world have no right, moral or otherwise, to impose sanctions on India.
- The CPI(M) firmly opposes the BJP-led governments nuclear policy which goes
counter to the longstanding foreign policy of nonalignment and peace and harms the
relations with neighbouring countries. The CPI(M) calls for (a) not going in for
weaponisation and deployment of nuclear weapons (b) India should continue to oppose
discriminatory treaties and not sign the CTBT (c) India should continue to campaign for
non-discriminatory agreements to check nuclear proliferation and for achieving universal
nuclear disarmament.
Situation of Instability Continues
- The BJP-led government was able to survive in office through a narrow majority thanks to
the support extended by the TDP. The BJP-led alliance is riddled with inner conflicts and
divergent pulls and pressures. The AIADMK led by Jayalalitha is demanding a price for its
support the undemocratic and illegal dismissal of the DMK government. A similar
narrow partisan agenda dictates the outlook of the Trinamul Congress which has
opportunistically aligned with the BJP. The dropping of three ministers successively
within the first two months of the government, the clashes between Jayalalitha and Hegde
which includes the Kaveri waters issue and the shameless appeasement and compromise with
opportunist leaders out to get office makes the BJP-led coalition a mockery of the slogan
of "stable government" which it had put out during the elections.
- Heading such a rickety coalition, the BJP will be all the more desperate to take
measures to try and consolidate its political position. Just as the nuclear bomb issue,
other sudden manoeuvres can take place which can harm the interests of the country and
national unity. Already the compromise with corruption has led to large-scale interference
in the income tax department and other sectors of the government machinery. This
opportunism and appeasement of corruption both in the case of Jayalalitha and Sukhram
exposes the hypocrisy of the BJP.
Fight Caste Oppression
- An important feature of this period has been the continuing political and social
assertion of those sections who are subjected to caste discrimination and oppression. As
noted in the 15th Congress, there is a dual aspect. There is growing awareness
among the dalits and other oppressed communities for social equality and to fight
oppression. This is a welcome development which has to be integrated with the democratic
movement and the anti-feudal struggle. At the same time there are some negative aspects.
Certain leaders of the dalits attempt to keep these sections away from the democratic
movement and use them for electoral manoeuvres. The BSP leadership provides a graphic
example of this opportunist vote-bank politics which led it to ally with the BJP. The
Party has to vigorously take up the fight against caste discrimination, untouchability and
social oppression alongwith the class issues of land and wages for the mass of the
scheduled castes in the rural areas. The dalit Christians should be provided reservation
as other Scheduled Castes. While countering all narrow caste exclusiveness, the Party
should emerge as the consistent fighter against all forms of social oppression.
- The caste situation during this period has further aggravated with the growth of caste
feelings. Aggressive efforts by certain upper caste sections to suppress the growing
consciousness of the socially oppressed is accentuating conflicts. There is also the
harmful trend of clashes between the OBCs and dalits when the latter try to assert their
rights. The bourgeois parties are fomenting casteism for their petty electoral
considerations. These developments are intensifying fragmentation of the people and
disrupting class unity. This is leading to caste tensions. This tendency is very harmful
to the growth of the democratic movement and has to be combated by the Party and Left
forces.
Adivasi Rights
- There is great unrest among the adivasis who after 50 years of independence are deprived
of their elementary rights endangering their very identity. They are subjected to the
worst forms of exploitation. Their lands are snatched away, their right to forests denied,
their lives disrupted by displacement from projects and they are ruthlessly exploited by
money lenders and contractors. Their plight is being utilised by the bourgeois landlord
parties to divert their discontent by raising the slogan of separate states. The RSS has
been working through its front, the Vanvashi Kalyan Parishad, to mobilise non-Christian
tribals in different parts of the country. They seek to disrupt tribal solidarity on a
Christian-non-Christian basis to counter the influence of the church in these areas. The
RSS seeks to uproot the tribal cultures and traditions and implant the Hindutva ideology
among the tribals who have been outside the Hindu fold. This is being done in a systematic
manner.
- The Party should come out against such forces in defence of the rights of the tribal
people to save their lands, access to forests, full rehabilitation when displaced and
protection of cultural rights. Based on the Partys programmatic understanding the
tribal people should be provided with regional autonomy with maximum powers in contiguous
areas where they live in large numbers so that they can manage their affairs and protect
their rights better. This slogan must be taken up seriously and popularised among the
adivasis.
Womens Status
- The worst impact of the new economic policies has been on poor women with loss of
existing jobs and shrinking employment opportunities. This new onslaught comes on top of
the increasing atrocities on women and oppressive customs such as dowry, sex determination
tests and female foeticide. Even caste and community feelings are roused to justify
atrocities on women and to oppose any action under the law. The much publicised demand for
reservations in parliament and legislative has still not seen the light of the day as most
of the bourgeois parties are opposing it. It is only the Left parties which have firmly
backed the womens movement on this issue. The party should work for the emancipation
of women. It must combat the increasing activities of the communal and fundamentalist
forces amongst them.
Demand for New States
- During this period demands for separate states have arisen from various quarters like
Jharkhand, Uttarkhand, Chattisgarh, Vidharba, Bodoland and Telengana. The economic
imbalance and the consequent backwardness of certain areas, the perpetuation of
backwardness in the adivasi belts and the utilisation of regional sentiments constitute
the factors leading to such regional movements.
- Some of the bourgeois parties are vying with each other to exploit regional sentiments
by raising such slogans to gain political support. Further, certain parties particularly
the BJP who have consistently opposed the linguistic formation of states are making
efforts to divide the states. The CPI(M) has opposed further division of the existing
states as this will only fuel more divisive and disruptive demands. The basic issue is
that of overcoming the backwardness of these regions. Whereas for the tribal compact and
contiguous areas, regional autonomy should be provided, the situation is different for the
regions which are backward. Here in regions such as Telengana and Vidharbha, the Party has
to seriously take up the campaigns for overcoming the backwardness of these regions while
opposing the demands for creation of separate states.
Regional Parties
- Regional parties have been in existence in various states for a long period of time.
However, it is in the recent period, particularly after the 1996 elections that these
parties have begun to play a heightened role through the coalition politics at the Centre.
Some of these regional parties reflect the linguistic-nationality sentiments of the people
of these states. Although in class terms, these parties generally represent the regional
bourgeoisie and landlords, it will not, however, be correct to characterise all the
regional parties in a single category. There are some that exploit chauvinistic or
communal passions for their political advance. The regional parties are able to garner
some popular support because of the aspirations of the people in these areas remaining
unfulfilled due to the policies of the bourgeois-landlord parties at the Centre. Given the
state-level preoccupation of these parties, they can take opportunistic positions purely
dictated by narrow considerations of being in power. Thus in the past some of these
parties allied with the Congress. Now with the BJP getting strengthened, parties like the
AIADMK, TDP and the National Conference have extended support to the BJP.
Jammu & Kashmir
- The elections to the state assembly in Jammu and Kashmir in September 1996 marked an
important stage in the struggle against the secessionist forces baked by Pakistan. The
initiative taken to hold the elections at the appropriate tide with about 50% of the
voters participating, was an achievement of the United Front government. The National
Conference headed by Farooq Abdullah won with a two-thirds majority. However, the state
government is yet to address the basic problems of the people who have suffered a lot in
the past years. Ensuring security for the people, improving the economic conditions and
providing employment should be the priority. Conditions for the return of the minority
community who fled the Valley has to be ensured. The ISI sponsored groups are still active
and their terroristic violence in places such as Doda, Poonch and Rajouri has to be firmly
checked.
- Instead of carrying on the struggle to get the Central government to fulfill the earlier
commitment to provide maximum autonomy to the state, Farooq Abdullah has caused immense
harm to the cause of the Kashmiri people by allying with the BJP-led government at the
Centre. Given the hostility of the BJP to the aspirations of autonomy and its stand of
scrapping Article 370, there is the danger of alienation of the people in the Valley
growing which will benefit the fundamentalist-separatist forces. The CPI(M) reiterates
that the basis for a lasting solution is to provide maximum autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir
within the framework of the Indian Union. Regional autonomy for Jammu and Ladakh should be
given within this overall framework.
North-East
- The entire North-East is a region which has suffered badly due to the wrong and
discriminatory policies of successive bourgeois-landlord governments at the Centre. The
narrow partisan aim of the Congress to garner support by patronising different groups of
politicians and nurturing a corrupt nexus led to development being hampered and growing
alienation. The United Front government made a good beginning by addressing the problems
of the region by the successive visits of the two Prime Ministers of the UF government.
The focus was on economic development and improving communications and infrastructure.
With the BJP coming to power at the Centre, there is a danger of the situation worsening
in the North-East. The BJP and the RSS have stepped up their efforts in this region. Their
purpose is to counter and reverse the growth of Christian influence. Such an approach will
aggravate the existing tensions in the region. The predominantly Christian communities of
the North-East will get further alienated and this will help the separatist forces.
- The ethnic problems have become acute with inter-ethnic clashes in Manipur, Meghalaya
and Assam. In Tripura, the two main extremist groups, the NLFT and ATTF, are operating
with shelters across the border. All effort should be made to ensure that the Central
government cooperates with the Left Front government and provides sufficient security
forces to tackle the violent activities of these groups. The Bodo problem continuous to
fester. Imperialist agencies led by the CIA and the ISI of Pakistan are actively involved
in fomenting discord and fueling separatism. The ULFA in Assam, the NSCN in Nagaland, the
PLA and UNLF in Manipur are actively engaged in advocating separation. It is essential
that these problems are dealt with an overall political perspective of seeking to
eliminate the roots of the alienation and providing democratic avenues for the ethnic and
minority groups. Every effort should be made to draw these groups into political
negotiations. Priority should be accorded in the countrys agenda to ensure the
speedy development of the North-East region by giving up the attitude of neglect which has
been prevailing so long.
Bankruptcy Of The Bourgeois-Landlord Rule
- The overall degeneration of parliamentary and state institutions is a symptom of the
crisis of the bourgeois-landlord system. Apart from the decay of the Constitutional
institutions, there is the growing menace of the criminalisation of politics which has now
invaded all the bourgeois parties. The threats to ordinary citizens from mafia groups and
criminals who are often in connivance with the police has grown in the recent period and
has now extended to the political system. Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra have seen
this phenomenon grow rapidly.
- The growing instability of the bourgeois-landlord system is leading to calls from
influential circles for modifying the political system. One such proposal, backed by the
BJP, is the introduction of a presidential form of government to replace the parliamentary
system. This is an authoritarian response to the political instability. Other suggestions
include guarantee of a five-year term for the Lok Sabha, formation of national governments
and direct election of Prime Minister by the Lok Sabha. The BJP governments move for
a comprehensive review of the Constitution by a committee of experts must be seen in this
light. All these measures seek to truncate parliamentary democracy and must be firmly
opposed.
High Level Corruption
- The 15th Party Congress and subsequent C.C. resolutions pointed out that
corruption intensified due to the policies of liberalisation. It has further exposed how
this institutionalised corruption comes directly from the new economic policies involving
a large number of leaders of the Congress, the BJP as well as other political parties. The
hawala scandal, the Sukh Ram affair, the JMM bribery case, the Satish Sharma cases, the
urea scam, the fodder scam in Bihar and the corruption cases against Jayalalitha are all
glaring instances of corruption in high places.
- The BJP is shamelessly appeasing and wooing corrupt politicians in order to keep its
governments going. At the Centre, it accomodated Buta Singh, charge-sheeted in the JMM
bribery case. It was forced to drop him after the Supreme Court rejected his appeal. In
Himachal, it has joined hands with Sukhram who is facing a host of corruption charges. In
its desperate quest to remain in power, the Vajpayee government has already allowed
interference in the administrative and judicial departments to facilitate scuttling of
cases against Jayalalitha. There is no difference between the BJP and the Congress as far
as attitude to high-level corruption is concerned.
- The Party has consistently fought against corruption as a part of the struggle against
the economic policies. This has to be intensified by exposing the BJPs role.
Development Issues
- There is a growing demand among the people for grassroot level development. However,
much of the benefit from the various developmental schemes do not reach the people who
require it the most. Recent experience has shown that only when such funds are devolved by
the state governments to democratically run local bodies and through them to the
beneficiaries, the people in rural India get some benefits. The peoples plan
movement in Kerala involving the people at all levels of planning is an outstanding
example. The experience of West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura clearly show that an effective
panchayat administration with adequate funds at their disposal can substantially improve
the welfare of the people. This issue of expansion and proper utilisation of funds for
developmental work must be earnestly taken up by the Party through mass mobilisation all
over the country.
Health and Population Policy
- The promise of providing basic health care to all citizens by 2000 AD is illusory. There
is a serious recurrence of infectious diseases. An expanded and strengthened primary
health centre network and a greater involvement of panchayats in health care are urgent
necessities. The fast increasing population which will cross the one billion mark at the
turn of the century is a matter of concern. It reflects the failure of the population
policies of successive governments. The current emphasis on target oriented methods
focussing exclusively on fertility control of poor women and use of hazardous
contraception has to be changed. The CPI(M) stands for a non-coercive policy based on
creating awareness for family planning among both men and women. Such a policy should
include important issues as development and improvement in living standards, control of
infant mortality, adult literacy with specific reference to womens literacy and
incentives for small families.
Child Labour
- The indefensible practice of child labour continues despite growing democratic opinion
against. In order to effectively remove this practice it is necessary to introduce
universal and compulsory primary education backed by adequate finances and infrastructural
support. The economic wherewithal to poor families would have to be provided through
widespread provision of free tuition fees, mid-day meals, uniforms etc.
Expand The Educational System
- Education and public expenditure on the educational system have suffered due to the
policies of liberalisation. Fifty years after independence, nearly fifty per cent of the
people are illiterate a shocking commentary on ruling class policies. A majority of
children drop out before completing the elementary stage of schooling. There will be no
scope for changing this dismal situation unless the public education system is expanded
and strengthened. For this, the privatisation and commercialisation of education
encouraged by the current policies have to be reversed. The cuts in higher education
outlays have to be halted and adequate funds provided. The CPI(M) will support the
movement by the students and teachers for alternative policies which will make education
accessible to all citizens.
- The Vajpayee government is making conscious efforts to recast the content of education
and infiltrate the Hindutva ideology into the educational and academic fields. The BJP
control of the Human Resources Development ministry is being utilised for this purpose as
is being done by its state governments in UP and Rajasthan. All secular forces must be
mobilised to ensure that the government-run or funded educational institutions and bodies
of higher research function on secular and democratic principles.
Culture and Media
- The CPI(M) will support all efforts for the creation of a democratic cultural ethos
which will serve the diverse cultural aspirations of the people. This requires combating
the twin threats of an anti-secular, communal value system invading our culture and the
onslaught of market-oriented consumerist values which debase our cultural foundations.
Culture must be the preserve for secular-humanist values. Campaigns for literacy, popular
science and for fighting obscurantist and socially reactionary values must be stepped up
by mobilising progressive cultural forces and popular cooperative efforts.
- The facilities granted to the foreign electronic media and the increasing privatisation
of television broadcasting is having a disastrous effect on our society and particularly
its cultural fabric. It is a conscious attempt to influence society and the youth with
socially pernicious values like obscurantism, consumerism, greedy individualism and
emphasis on violence and sex. Foreign control of the media will pose a serious threat to
our sovereignty by facilitating imperialist penetration. There has to be regulation of the
foreign satellite channels. The entry of foreign enterprises in the print media should not
be allowed. The Party will oppose the growing trend towards privatisation and
commercialisation of the media. The prime need is to ensure an effective public
broadcasting service through an autonomous Prasar Bharati. The ordinance promulgated by
the BJP government undermines the autonomy of Prasar Bharati. The Party will oppose any
effort by the BJP government to interfere in the working of the Prasar Bharati
Corporation.
Environment
- The liberalisation policies are also leading to dangerous environmental degradation.
Vast tracts of land are being sought by the multinational corporations and Indian big
business which will further reduce the fragile forest cover required for Indias
ecological balance. Pollution of air and water resources is posing serious health hazards.
Toxic industrial wastes are imported and dumped here. Safe drinking water is becoming
scarce. The contractor / bureaucratic nexus gets away with the indiscriminate destruction
of forests. While development cannot be a casualty in the name of ecological conservation,
environmental concerns must be incorporated in strategy of sustainable development.
Science and Technology
- One damaging effect that these economic policies of liberalisation are having is the
virtual stifling of domestic scientific research. Outmoded or ill suited technology is
brought into the country which really does not suit our conditions or benefit the people.
Its aim is only to garner greater profits. This is bolstered by newer pressures being
mounted by the WTO particularly to amend the Indian Patents Act. In every field of modern
science, Indian scientists have major accomplishments. Adequate attention would have to be
paid to domestic scientific research and development and the creation of a strong
technology infrastructure.
Judiciary
- Consequent to the institutionalised corruption pervading the whole system, the Narshima
Rao government did everything possible to protect and shield corruption in high places. It
was the higher judiciary which intervened to see that investigations into corruption
scandals were not covered up as in the hawala, St. Kitts, fodder and JMM cases. The
failure of the executive brought into prominence judicial intervention. Unless the
executive is made accountable and discharges its responsibilities, problems will arise if
all matters are left to the judiciary. A proper balance between the parliament, executive
and judiciary should be maintained. It must be borne in mind that the present legal system
is not able to cope with the enormous number of cases and dispense justice in time. In the
recent period, there have been judicial decisions that reflect the anti-worker bias of
liberalistion. The prohibition on bandhs, the order to close down factories in Delhi on
environmental grounds without adequate safeguards for workers are some such instances.
Further, the all pervading corruption is having its corrosive effects within the judiciary
also. In order to insulate the judiciary from unhealthy pressures and to ensure its
independence it is essential that a National Judicial Commission is set up for the
appointment of judges to the high courts and the Supreme Court.
Foreign Policy
- Indias foreign policy based on non-alignment and peace has come under direct
attack by the BJP-led government. Under the United front government, steps were taken to
improve relations with our neighbours particularly Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka. The
ongoing improvement of relations with China led to the visit of Jiang Zemin and the
signing of the agreement on confidence building measures in 1996. At one stroke, the
Vajpayee government has jeopardised these gains. The openly hostile stand against China by
the defence minister and the targetting of China by the Prime Minister in his letter to
Clinton have set back the process of normalisation. The UF government had taken the
correct decision not to sign the CTBT. By conducting the nuclear tests and boasting that
India is a nuclear weapons state, the Vajpayee government opened the doors for mounting
pressures on India to join the discriminatory treaties under threat of sanctions. The
Kashmir issue has been internationalised and relations with Pakistan further strained. The
Durban Summit of the nonaligned countries showed the isolation of India due to the
shortsighted politics of the Vajpayee government.
- The Vajpayee government while protesting against the sanctions imposed by the United
States, is not moved by any anti-imperialist principles. It is willing to sign the CTBT to
appease the US. It wants to continue the strategic dialogue with the United States and
develop further the Indo-US military cooperation and joint military exercise which were
first begun by the Rajiv Gandhi Government in 1988. In order to appease the US in the
post-Pokhran period, the Vajpayee government virtually endorsed the wanton US missile
attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan.
- The BJP government marked a break with the foreign policy orientation which has served
India well in the past. The CPI(M) has to accord the highest priority to mobilise the
people to fight the jingoistic foreign policy postures of the BJP. A broad unity can be
forged for the restoration of the foreign policy orientation towards non-alignment,
South-South cooperation and world peace. Contrary to the BJPs proimperialist
postures, the struggle to restore Indias anti-imperialist orientation in foreign
policy must be waged vigorously. India has to take a firm stand to oppose all imperialist
attacks on third world countries and national liberation movements. Defence of
non-alignment, strengthening of bonds with neighbouring countries in South Asia and more
South-South cooperation should be foremost on the agenda.
FEATURES OF THE NEW SITUATION
3.1 The BJP, which has emerged as the major party in the 1998 elections, has its
ideological and philosophical basis in the pernicious theory of Hindu rashtra. This suits
the interests of imperialism and sections of the ruling classes but is disruptive of
national unity and social harmony in a country as diverse and plural as ours. The BJP
coming to power is not an ordinary change of government from one bourgeois party to
another. This is so because, unlike other parties, the BJP is the political wing of the
RSS which has a fascistic ideology.
3.2 The BJP has grown in strength. It found new allies like the AIADMK, the Biju Janata
Dal, the Trinamul Congress and Lok Shakti for the 1998 Lok Sabha elctions, apart from its
earlier allies the Shiv Sena, Samata Party and Akali Dal. It was able to poll 25.5 percent
and together with its allies it could get 37 percent of the vote. But it was able to form
the government Though the BJP has grown in new areas and states, it must be noted that it
is still a weak force in many states. It requires allies to come into power at the Centre.
- The BJP-led coalition is an unstable and an opportunist alliance. Despite the BJPs
best efforts and massive use of money, it could get only around 25 percent of the vote. It
suffered reverses in states like Rajasthan and Maharashtra where it is in government.
Resort to communal appeal, jingoism and corrupt manoeuvres cannot hide the fact that the
BJPs hold on power is precarious. Its popular base is still a minority of the
electorate with 63 percent voting against the BJP alliance.
- It is clear that at present, no single party can come to power on its own. Both the
major bourgeois-landlord parties, the Congress and the BJP, each have roughly one-fourth
of the peoples support. In order to assume the reins of State power, both need to
find allies to form a coalition government at the Centre. The allies they are trying to
win over do not fit in with their political-ideological framework but such temporary
allies are sought opportunistically to meet the present situation.
- The current situation is a result of the policies pursued by the bourgeois-landlord
ruling classes and their political agents. The congress partys continuous decline is
due to its adherence to the liberalisation policy dictated by the IMF-World Bank; its
record of compromise with the communal forces resulting in the alienation of minorities;
and it being corroded by high level corruption. The ideological erosion in the secular
values of the Congress is glaringly shown in the last two years. Firstly, there was a
defection of the majority of Congress MLAs from the UP assembly to the BJP. Later with the
fall of the United Front government, some Congress leaders deserted the party and joined
the BJP. Though the entry of Sonia Gandhi checked the exodus, there has been no attempt to
critically review why such an erosion took place. The Congress is still riven by
factionalism in most states.
- Though the BJP appealed to the people in the garb of a "party with a
difference", its policies in the economic sphere have only further strengthed the
process of liberalisation and imposing greater burdens on the people. Having promised to
fight corruption in high places during the elections, the BJP has in the most brazen
manner embraced corrupt politicians and continues to defend them in order to remain in
power. Despite all its tall claims of discipline, it is ridden with internal dissensions.
- The United Front stood united in the face of the Congress blackmail and refused to
succumb to the demand for the removal of the DMK ministers on the pretext of the Jain
Commission report. However, the United Front got weakened and divided after the elections.
The weakening of the Janata Dal, the Telegu Desams betrayal and defection to the BJP
and the opportunism of the National Conference reflects this disarray. One of the features
of the non-Left constituents of the United Front has been the pursuit of the policies of
liberalisation where they are in power in the states. Whether it be the TDP government in
Andhra Pradesh, or the DMK government in Tamil Nadu, or the Janata Dal government in
Karnataka, they are in tune with the economic policies being pursued by the Centre.
Despite these problems, the forces who can comprise the third alternative have to be
regrouped.
- The imperialist countries headed by the USA welcomed the formation of the BJP-led
government. This was because of the assurance that the BJP would be following economic
policies basically similar to that of the Congress. Further the imperialist forces do not
want a government at the Centre, which would be dependent on the support of the Left.
Despite the strain in relations with the western countries due to the BJP
governments nuclear policy, the Vajpayee government has been signaling that it is
prepared to come to an understanding with the United States.
- The systematic purveying of market and consumerist values, the erosion of commitment to
secular and democratic principles in the bourgeois-landlord circles and the enormous rise
of communal forces; the loss of moral and ethical values witnessed in the large-scale
looting of public funds and the willingness of ruling class politicians to act as agents
of big business have had their impact on the political situation.
- The development of capitalism over the decades has created a large middle class. In the
absence of a powerful democratic movement they come under the influence of the
bourgeois-landlord classes. Illusions are fostered amongst them about the benefits of
liberalisation. The communal forces are also able to exert an appeal on the urban middle
classes. The bourgeois media targets these sections to foster mindless consumerism and
anti-democratic values. They seek to depoliticise the younger generation belonging to the
middle classes. The Party has to conduct intense ideological work amongst them to draw
them into the democratic movement.
- In the past three and half years, the struggles of the working class have seen strikes
by coal workers, jute workers, insurance and bank employees, public sector employees, and
other sections against the dismantling of the public sector, closures, retrenchments and
cuts in their benefits. The struggle against financial sector liberalisation, in
particular the opening of the insurance sectors, privatisation of coal mining, oil
industry, fertiliser and other sector, are continuing. The Central government employees
conducted successful struggles on bonus and the implementation of Pay Commission
recommendations. The state government employees launched struggles against downsizing and
related issues. The struggles of the peasantry and agricultural workers for land, wages
and against social oppression have taken place in different parts of the country. Notable
among them being the agricultural workers struggle in Andhra Pradesh, peasants
struggles in Rajasthan, Bihar and Karnataka. The fishermen have fought back the entry of
foreign and joint venture trawlers. There have been many protest movements against
atrocities and social oppression of women. The youth and students have been fighting
against privatisation of education and lack of employment opportunities. The nationwide
postal employees strike and the college and university teachers strike were important
struggles after the BJP came to power.
- Despite all these struggles, it is a fact that in the 18-month period of the United
Front government, there was no all-India general strike or bandhs against the economic
policies as during the Narasimha Rao government period between 1991 and 1995. This lull in
the mass movement was not helpful in channelising the popular discontent towards the Left
and democratic forces. With the advent of the BJP-led government and the new attacks
through the Union Budget and the stepped up privatisation, it will be necessary to develop
wider and more intensive struggles.
Tasks Before The Party
- In the present situation, the struggle against the BJP-RSS combine and the communal
forces assumes utmost importance. There must be a proper appreciation of the danger posed
by a communal party holding the reins of State power. The Party will have to make the
fight against these forces its central task in the coming days.
- The present political situation is also marked by the continuing onslaught of the
policies of economic liberalisation which have harmful consequences for the people and our
economic sovereignty; and the widespread corruption which has corroded the ruling
establishment. The Vajpayee government faced with sanctions after the nuclear tests has
stepped up the drive for liberalisation and privatisation to woo foreign capital. The
growing economic difficulties presages more attacks on the working class and the people.
The struggle against the current economic policies is part of the overall struggle against
the global offensive of international finance capital and the imperialist countries who
have made India a major target for their operations.
- In the present conditions, the struggle against the communal forces, their designs to
disrupt national unity and the democratic movement assume importance. This can be done
only on the basis of a broad based mobilisation. The efforts to forge and strengthen the
third alternative, in electoral terms, will have to be renewed. While there is no question
of an alliance, or, united front with the Congress with its present policies, efforts must
be made to reach out to its mass following which has a sizeable section of people adhering
to secularism.
- In order to advance the struggle to isolate the communal forces and to resist the
attacks on the livelihood of the people, it is necessary to project a third alternative
despite the setback to the United Front in the last elections. The forging of a third
alternative is still relevant. The forging of the unity of all the Left democratic and
secular forces to meet the immediate situation is essential. The formation of the third
alternative is a continuing struggle. Some of the secular bourgeois parties will come and
go out of this formation. But strengthening of the third alternative depends on how far
the Left and democratic forces are able to mobilise the people by unleashing mass
struggles on key issues such as fight against communalism and liberalisation.
- The Party and the Left forces must take the lead in fighting the economic policies. They
have to take constant initiative for intensifying this resistance. It is necessary to see
the link between the struggle against liberalisation and the fight against the communal
forces. While striving for cooperation with all the secular bourgeois parties to isolate
the BJP, the Party will not relax its opposition to the liberalisation policies either at
the national or state levels.
- In the context of the current situation, while carrying on the struggle against the
communal danger, the struggle against liberalisation has to be carried forward together.
The key importance of the independent role and intervention of the Left becomes centered
on these tasks.
- It is the Left forces which have to take the initiative continuously to mobilise all the
forces to fight the different aspects of liberalisation and its pernicious consequences,
whether it be the working class, the peasantry, the agricultural workers, women, artisans
and other toiling sections. All who are victims of the globalisation-liberalisation
process should be brought into struggle by the Left-led united forums.
- The Party attaches the utmost importance to the resistance being organised and built up
through the forging of the broadest unity of trade unions, mass organisations and groups
who have come together in such forums as the National Platform of Mass Organisations. The
resistance to the economic policies put up in the last few years have shown that these
policies can be fought and checked if mass struggles are built up. The fight for the
reversal of these policies and the struggle for an alternative economic policy requires
the further widening and intensification of the united mass movements and struggles.
- One of the major tasks before the Party is to step up the political-ideological work in
such a manner as to consolidate the influence gained through the various struggles led by
the Party and the mass organisations. A continuous political campaign to counter the
political slogans of the bourgeois-landlord parties and systematic ideological work to
combat the communal and reactionary ideologies is necessary, if the Party is to
consolidate its existing influence and win over new sections of people.
- In the coming days, struggles on the basic class issues of the industrial workers and of
agricultural workers and poor peasants must be stepped up in a big way. Struggle for
redistribution of ceiling surplus land, record of rights, minimum wages for unorganised
workers and agricultural labourers and fight against social oppression are all issues for
all-India movements.
- Attention should be paid to build up an anti-imperialist movement, against the pressures
of US imperialism to curtail Indias sovereignty and security interests and the
relentless efforts to make India conform to the demands of finance capital through the
IMF-World Bank and WTO institutions. While opposing the BJP governments nuclear
weaponisation and jingoism, the Party should mobilise people against any compromising
stand towards US imperialism.
- While strengthening the Left and democratic forces, the Party will have to pay attention
to developing the left, democratic and secular alternative to meet the immediate
situation. Its concrete shape can be determined on the basis of the developments in the
coming days. Our efforts should be directed towards such an alternative that meets the
immediate requirements, in which the Left plays its due role.
Strengthen Left Unity
3.25 These key tasks require above all the strengthening of Left Unity and the
growing strength of the Left forces. For this, first of all the independent strength of
the Party has to be expanded. This can be done if the Party is in the forefront of all the
struggles against communalism, to defend national unity and against imperialism. The Party
has to take up the political-ideological and cultural fight against the reactionary and
divisive forces in a much bigger way. The pernicious philosophy of Hindutva, its
inherently anti-democratic and reactionary character must be exposed among the people. The
increasing reliance of the bourgeois parties to utilise caste appeal and perpetuate
casteism must be countered. The Party's independent positions based on its programmatic
understanding must be taken to the people and projected on a large scale. It is with this
continuous political-ideological activity that the Party can consolidate politically the
work done in the sphere of mass struggles and fight against economic policies.
3.26 The other aspect of strengthening Left intervention is the necessity to
consolidate and carry forward Left unity. On the major national political issues, the Left
parties have a broad common understanding which should be the basis for continuous united
left activities. Left unity has to be consolidated by joint political campaigns and
organisational coordination. Both at the national level and the state level, this process
has to be carried forward. This process has to be carried forward through the Coordination
Committee of the four Left parties and by closer ties between the CPI(M) and the CPI. The
Party should strive to bring all Left-minded groups, intellectuals and individuals into
common activities on the issues spelt out in the Left and democratic programme.
3.27 The CPI(M) and other Left parties supported the United Front government from
outside. Inspite of the CPI participating in the government, the coordination between the
Left parties helped to tackle the situation from a common standpoint. There were
differences with the CPI on some issues such as the formation of smaller states and
implementation of reservation for the OBCs with creamy layer excluded etc. After the 1996
general elections, the Left together was able to play an important role in rallying all
the secular forces to stop the BJP coming to power. It rallied other democratic and
secular parties in forming the United Front. However, it could not exercise sufficient
influence for the implementation of those policies which benefit the common man. A joint
election manifesto was adopted for the first time by the Left parties during the 1998
general elections. This was a significant step forward though it could not be sufficiently
projected during the election campaign.
3.28 The Lefts emphasis on developing joint struggles and movements and drawing
in the masses from all other parties should help the Left to widen its base and increase
its strength and influence in the coming period.
The Left-Led Governments
- West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura with its Left-led governments, represent the strongest
bases of the Left and democratic movement in the country. Foremost among them is the West
Bengal Left Front government which has completed a historic 21 years in office. The Left
Front in West Bengal represents the most developed formation of the Left forces in the
country which has been built up over decades of class struggles and mass movements. The
Left Front government has shown that within the present framework, the Left can implement
certain alternative policies despite the limitations of the bourgeois-landlord system. It
has been able to consistently implement policies in favour of the working class, peasantry
and other sections of the working people. The record of the Left Front government provides
a standing testimony to the central importance of implementing land reforms for making a
breakthrough in altering the social conditions of the people. This has resulted in a
steady increase in agricultural production and instilled confidence in the rural poor who
have found a voice through the elected panchayati raj system and decentralisation of
power. The holding of panchayat elections in May 1998 for the fifth successive term and
the victory of the Left Front marks a unique record in the country. The Left Front
government is now attending to the work of promoting industrialisation keeping in view the
overall policy of liberalisation and ensuring that the public sector does not get
weakened. The 21 year record of the West Bengal government also shows the difference of
how a government can firmly uphold secular values in contrast to the record of bourgeois
governments.
- In Kerala, the Left Democratic Front Government took office once again in 1996 after
winning the elections. It has given primacy to decentralisation of powers and initiated a
unique scheme for peoples participation in the planning process at all levels. The
LDF government has shown how the interests of the common people can be protected in the
face of continuous price rise by preserving and strengthening the public distribution
system. The LDF government has also taken concrete steps to eliminate high level
corruption which was a marked feature of the previous Congress led UDF regime.
- In Tripura, the Left Front Government for the past five years has been firmly defending
national unity and communal amity by countering the extremist challenge. In the
North-East, it has set an example by consistently defending tribal-non tribal unity,
reviving the panchayat system and the Tripura Tribal Area Autonomous District Council and
taking measures to improve the economic conditions of the people in this inaccessible and
landlocked state. In the 1998 assembly elections, the people voted the Left Front back to
power with a big majority.
- When the entire country is faced with the twin onslaughts of liberalistion and
communalism, the Left-led governments have been the centres for projecting alternative
policies, defending secularism and protecting the democratic rights of the people. It is
the duty of the Party and the Left and democratic forces to support and project the
policies and achievements of these governments.
Build Left and Democratic Front
- The CPI(M) is pledged to work for the Peoples Democratic Revolution. In the course
of this basic aim, it sees the Left and Democratic Front as the transitional stage in the
struggle to build the peoples democratic front. As distinct from the third
alternative against the BJP and the Congress, and the broad unity to keep the communal
forces at bay, the real alternative to the bourgeois landlord policies can only come from
the Left and democratic alternative.
- The only way to change the correlation of class forces is by strengthening the Left and
democratic forces and winning over the masses following the bourgeois parties on the basis
of concrete slogans and demands arising out of the fight against the bourgeois-landlord
policies and the political and ideological struggle against the ruling class ideologies.
The immediate tactical line followed by the Party helps us to meet the concrete situation
facing us today. But it alone is not sufficient to bring a real alternative which requires
a radical change in the correlation of class forces.
- All the work of the Party, politically, ideologically and organisationally, should be
geared to the basic task of strengthening and building up the Left and Democratic Front.
This is a front which has to be built on the basis of mass struggles, popular movements
and the forging of the widest unity of the working people. The Left and democratic
platform alone can offer a full-fledged alternative to liberalisation and the destructive
path of communalism and casteism.
Programme of Left and Democratic Forces
3.36 The 16th Congress of the CPI(M) presents the main features of the programme on
which the Left and democratic forces can mobilise the people and advance.
(i) Defend Secularism
Separate religion from politics under the Constitution, strengthen secular
character of the State and its institutions and combat anti-secular ideologies in the
special sphere. Defence of national unity, countering divisive communal and separatist
forces. Enforce rule of law and judicial process for resolving disputes such as Ayodhya.
(ii) Federalism
Restructure Centre-State relations with more powers to the states; revitalise
panchayat system and devolve administrative and financial powers. Replace Article 356 with
suitable clause to be used only with the sanction of Parliament when national unity or the
integrity of the country is threatened. Revamp role of Governors.
(iii) Strengthen Democracy
Expand democratic rights of citizens; withdraw repressive legislations like ESMA
and NSA; strengthen parliamentary democracy by proportional representation with partial
list system for elections; electoral reforms to eliminate malpractices; fight against
corruption at all levels.
(iv) Economic Policy
a) Roll back regime of liberalisation and privatisation. Self reliant economic
growth; strengthen public sector in core and strategic sectors; encourage medium and small
scale industries; ensure adequate resource mobilisation by increasing direct taxes and
curbing black money. Foreign capital investment to be based on national priorities and
requirements of advanced technology.
b) Implementation of radical land reforms, distribution of surplus land cultivable
waste land to the landless; adequate public investment for agricultural development;
expansion of irrigation facilities, credit to poorer sections of peasantry.
(v) Rights of working people
Need based minimum wages for workers; recognition of trade unions on the basis of
secret ballot; statutory provision for worker's participation in management; end
discrimination of women workers; equal wages for equal work. Ensure minimum wages for
agricultural workers and other rights through Central legislation. Right to work as a
fundamental right in the Constitution.
(vi) For People's Welfare
Provision of a comprehensive public distribution system to cover 14 essential
commodities; adequate procurement of food stocks by the State for this purpose; compulsory
primary education and universal elementary education; free education upto the secondary
stage. Revamping educational system on democratic and secular and scientific lines.
Improvement of public health system and expansion of primary health centres with adequate
stocks of medicines. Housing to be given status of a basic right.
(vii) For Development
Promoting balanced development of all regions through planning. Decentralisation of
development decisions upto the panchayat and local bodies level. Environmental policy
integrated with needs for rapid and sustainable development. Promoting indigenous
scientific and technological research for independent development.
(viii) For Social Justice
Equality for women in all social spheres by ending all forms of discrimination.
Equal rights in property; joint pattas for women; provision of one-third reservation for
women in legislatures and Parliament.
Eliminate untouchability and atrocities against scheduled castes and tribes by
stringent action. Ensure reservation quotas for them are filled. Ensure right to forests,
land and cultural identity of adivasis. Regional autonomy for contiguous areas with
majority adivasi population.
Equality of all Indian languages. Development of a democratic, secular culture.
(ix) Foreign Policy
Non-aligned foreign policy with anti-imperialist orientation; no nuclear
weaponisation; strive for universal nuclear disarmament; strengthen relations with
socialist countries; support to anti-imperialist struggles and world peace; policy of
friendship and closer ties with neighbouring countries.
Strengthen The Party
3.37 The success in advancing the Left and democratic forces by rallying all
sections of the working people based on struggles for the Left and democratic programme
requires a rapid and significant increase in the strength of the Party. The CPI(M)
represents the most advanced sections who embrace the ideology of the working class. It
has, even in the period since the setbacks to socialism, stood firmly by the basic
principles of Marxism-Leninism. It is essential that the Party renew and sharpen its
ideological outlook based on Marxism and proletarian internationalism, so that it can
discharge its responsibilities to forge the Left and democratic alternative and advance
towards the People's Democratic Revolution. The ideological discussions initiated in the
1992 ideological Resolution should be carried forward.
3.38 In the present context, the Party has to be the foremost fighter against the twin
evils of majoritarian communalism and the IMF-World Bank sponsored liberlisation. It must
be on the basis of developing mass movements drawing the vast sections of people who are
today outside the purview of the Communist movement.
3.39 Sufficient attention has not been paid to building the Party organisation and
streamlining organisational work. To be equipped to expand politically and
organisationally, the Party must overcome the defects and shortcomings in its organisation
and style of work. The entire Party has to be vigilant to ensure that alien class
influences and harmful trends such as parliamentarism, factionalism and erosion of
Communist values which have surfaced do not take root. The revolutionary character of the
Party based on democratic centralism must be protected and strengthened. The rectification
campaign conducted in the recent period must be carried forward to rid the Party of all
unhealthy trends at all levels.
3.40 The Party must adopt a correct approach to the development of mass organisations.
The independent broad based mass organisations drawing in millions of the working people
with live contact with their lives and problems are the basis on which the Party can
rapidly advance. The Party has a special responsibility to see that class unity and the
unity of masses are forged through united activities launched from the united platforms of
mass organisations.
3.41 On the basis of such intervention and activity the Party should appeal to the vast
sections of people presently rallying behind the bourgeois parties. The conditions
described above will adversely affect the livelihood of a vast mass of Indian people. The
consequent discontent must be channelised behind Left and democratic forces. In achieving
this, the Party should seek political allies who share our concerns.
3.42 The year-long observance of the 50th anniversary of independence concluded on
August 15, 1998. The year was utilised by the Party to conduct an ideological campaign
against the communal, fundamentalist and casteist ideas which militate against the ideals
of the freedom struggle and to assert the values of patriotism and secular democracy which
alone can strengthen the basis of Indian unity. The anniversary year was also the occasion
for the CPI(M) and the Left to create awareness among the masses of the failure of the
bourgeois-landlord classes to fulfill the aspirations of the people who made tremendous
sacrifices for national independence. The experience of the past fifty years shows that
fighting the economic battles, which are of great importance, alone is not sufficient. We
have to also conduct the ideological struggle with equal emphasis against the
bourgeois-landlord classes. This struggle has to be carried forward in the coming days.
3.43 Fifty years have passed since India became independent. Our Party has played an
important role in the life of the country during this period in fighting against
imperialism and bourgeois-landlord rule. On this occasion we pledge to build a mass
revolutionary party capable of rendering historic service in leading the Indian people to
full socio-economic emancipation and for an India free from poverty and exploitation.
|